If the CITES Conference of the Parties
(COP16) in Bangkok next March approves the application to downlist Tanzania’s
elephant population from Appendix 1 to the lesser protection of Appendix 2, the
African country intends to seek approval for trade in hunting trophies for
non-commercial purposes, trade in registered raw ivory (whole tusks and
pieces), trade in raw hides including feet, ears and tails, and trade in
live animals.
The London-based Environmental
Investigation Agency (EIA) today called the proposal ‘ludicrous’, coming as it
does at a time when ivory poaching is escalating and the CITES ivory-trading
mechanism itself is increasingly being called into question.
EIA Executive Director and Elephant
Campaign head Mary Rice said: “The very system CITES uses to permit so-called
‘one-off’ auctions is profoundly flawed and, we believe, a major driver of
poaching and the illegal international trade in ivory.
“It’s ludicrous for Tanzania to even
consider applying for permission to cash in on its stockpile – dumping more
than 100 tonnes of ivory onto the market will only serve to further confuse
consumers as to the legal status of ivory, stimulating fresh demand, spurring
the black market and leading to more poaching.
“Parties to CITES need to regain control
of the destructive world ivory markets and end the damage done to undermine the
1989 ivory trade ban by firmly vetoing all proposals for ivory sales. They can
start by emphatically rejecting Tanzania’s proposal in March, sending out an
unequivocal message that all ivory is blood ivory.”
Tanzania last submitted proposals to
CITES COP15 in March 2010 for a sale of 90 tonnes of stockpiled ivory and to
downlist its elephant population from Appendix I to Appendix II.
Despite Tanzania’s claim at the time
that its elephant population was “secure”, EIA undercover investigations in the
country in January and February of 2010 found flourishing trade in illegal
ivory at both domestic and international levels, exacerbated by poor
enforcement and facilitated by official corruption.
EIA’s investigation showed that the
Tanzanian authorities appeared unwilling, or unable, to exercise control of
poaching and ivory trafficking and its subsequent report Open Season was
a key factor in both proposals being defeated when they were put to the vote at
COP15. It seems very little has changed and, if anything, the situation
has worsened.
At a meeting of the CITES Standing
Committee in Geneva this July, the CITES Secretariat and other expert groups
expressed concern that Tanzania remains a key exit point for illegal
consignments of ivory. The Secretariat stated: “More large-scale ivory seizures
are currently being directed to Asian destinations through Indian Ocean
seaports in Kenya and the United Republic of Tanzania than any other trade
route from Africa.”
No comments:
Post a Comment