Credibility of
international programme hangs in the balance
DELHI, INDIA: Tiger Range
Countries meet in Delhi, India next week to evaluate progress of the Global
Tiger Recovery Programme (GTRP) in what will be a true test of their national
commitment to end the tiger trade.
The
GTRP was signed into existence in November 2010 in St Petersburg, Russia, with
the common objective of doubling the world’s wild tiger population by 2022.
The
agenda for the Delhi meeting, from May 15-17, includes issues which to date
have received too little attention in this forum – demand reduction and effective
enforcement.
With
final preparations for the meeting underway, the Environmental Investigation
Agency (EIA) today warned that concrete action is needed to shut down tiger
breeding operations and destroy their stockpiles of tiger skins and bones if
the GTRP is to retain serious credibility.
EIA
lead campaigner Debbie Banks said: “Successful demand reduction will be
dependent on the closure of operations that breed tigers for trade in their
parts and derivatives, and those that provide the living specimens to stock
such operations.”
Operations
in Thailand, Laos and Vietnam have been implicated in the illegal international
trade; in China, breeders are allowed to sell farmed tiger skins on the
domestic market.
“This
trade simply serves to perpetuate demand, undermining enforcement efforts and
sending mixed messages to consumers,” added Banks.
Tiger
farming was hotly debated in 2007 at the 14th Meeting of the Conference of
Parties to the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
(CITES), where the majority of Parties voted against domestic and international
trade in parts of farmed tigers and called for a phasing out of such
operations.
No
country has yet reported on what action is being taken to fulfil the CITES
decision.
While
there have been recent high profile seizures and arrests in Thailand, and
Vietnam has prosecuted at least one tiger farm owner, there is no report of
action against tiger farmers in Laos; China stated in March 2011 that it had
inspected tiger breeding operations, but it has not shared information on any
convictions of those found selling tiger bone and products.
China
also allows tiger breeding operations to maintain freezers full of tiger
carcasses, instead of destroying them as urged by CITES. While tiger bone trade
is currently prohibited, China has a scheme for registering, labelling and
selling the skins but refuses to disclose how many skins have entered the
scheme.
“How can these stockpiles possibly be justified?” asked
Banks. “Maintaining stockpiles serves no conservation purpose; it only creates
confusion and speculates that one day these parts may be traded for profit.
That runs completely counter to a commitment to end tiger trade and totally
undermines efforts at demand reduction.
“For
the credibility of the GTRP, we need to see unequivocal and emphatic action to
shut down all commercial tiger breeding operations and to transparently destroy
the stockpiles.”